A Civil Debate
Elaine Donnelly wrote Tuesday on National Review Online that SLDN engaged in "personal attacks" against her. We didn't and don't. Go back and read the articles in Boston Globe she referenced here and here. Highlighting a policy position she has taken-no women in the military-is certainly not a personal attack.
We do find it ironic that someone without military experience, like Ms. Donnelly-again, no judgment at all, just the facts, mam'-can suggest that "some ideologues" (we presume she means us) have "little or no respect for the military culture." (BTW: Isn't Ms. Donnelly an ideologue?)
Actually, we're a pretty pro-military organization. Many of us here have served around the world, including in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, and Korea. We have also provided legal services to more than 9,000 U.S. service members since the 1990s. And we have pro-military allies-straight and gay, conservative and progressive-who want to lift the ban.
Because of our strong military background and expertise, we fervently believe in examining the ways to build an even stronger, smarter, and tougher military. This is one reason why we think "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" should be repealed by Congress.
Our military, already hurting in recruitment of qualified people, would get stronger if sexual orientation were a nonissue. Why? Because the literally thousands of folks who get kicked out are some of the most highly qualified, decorated service members around. You just can't replace a decorated Arabic linguist kicked out under DADT with a serious felon. (Yes, this is happening.)
We welcome an ongoing, civil exchange of ideas with Ms. Donnelly and others. This is an important and timely debate.
02-11-09 By Aubrey Sarvis, SLDN Executive Director |
3 Comments
Comments for this entry are closed.Bleu Copas in Johnson City, TN on February 13, 2009 at 02.18 pm
It amazes me that Elaine gets so much national airtime—like she’s the last person holding onto this ancient artifact. I could understand if she had a little more credibility or relevant experience, but sadly, she doesn’t. Still, her voice speaks to many who assume her words are the endtruth…she arms them with her hate and fear, and they run with it. Seriously, I’ve seen her face or name several times in the last couple of weeks, and I think it would serve us well to become even has as visible. Find our allies and bring them with you!! Do not be silent.
Alan on February 12, 2009 at 05.39 pm
Again, Ms. Donnelly fights to keep herself and her position relevant with a statement lacking any real substance. I’m tired of hearing her false claims and weak arguments. Although, I guess I should be happy that that she’s the opposition rather than someone who can put together a real argument…especially when she’s testifying in front of Congress.
Michael Magee in San Diego on February 11, 2009 at 06.31 pm
It is truly ironic when some like Ms. Donnelly is able to claim victimhood when in fact she who has made a living from from denigrating the honorable service of literally thousands of Gay and Lesbian Servicemembers. It is my hope that upon repeal we will see the last of Elaine and her histrionics.