Frontlines: The Latest from OutServe-SLDN

Bishop Robinson’s Letter Exposes Empty Arguments of Repeal Opponents

Bishop Gene RobinsonThe following letter from the Right Reverend Gene Robinson, ninth bishop of the Diocese of New Hampshire in the Episcopal Church of the United States, underscores the nonevent that repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” will be for military chaplains that may disagree with homosexuality. The opposition uses fear tactics in their attempt to derail repeal, saying that if DADT was overturned, military chaplains will suffer, cutting short their religious liberty. This notion is far from true. Chaplains will continue to be able to preach how they wish, they just won’t be able to turn in a gay or lesbian service member who may come to them for guidance.

Lifting 'don't ask, don't tell' won't threaten religious freedom

Commentary writer Daniel Blomberg, in the piece "If gays serve openly, will chaplains suffer? Yes. Religious liberty is in real jeopardy," raises needless fears based on a flawed understanding of the policies that govern the military chaplaincy (On Religion, The Forum, July 12). These policies are designed to preserve and protect the free exercise of religion in the military and would remain in effect after the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" (DADT).

No Roman Catholic, fundamentalist Christian or Orthodox Jewish chaplain would have to change her or his beliefs about homosexuality. If any gay or lesbian servicemembers went to one of these chaplains, they would still receive the counseling against homosexuality they have always received. What they wouldn't receive is a discharge from their military service for being gay and speaking about it.

Presumably, these same chaplains have counseled soldiers against getting an abortion, even though it is perfectly legal to do so. Speaking against homosexuality is what gay and lesbian soldiers have come to expect from these brands of religious leaders. Within each chaplain's congregation, he or she will continue to be free to preach according to the tenets of his or her own faith. That will not change.

The separation of church and state is safe under DADT. What is not safe is the employment of our gay and lesbian service men and women who are simply seeking the right to enjoy the "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" that they are willing to risk their lives defending.

Blomberg laments the "subtle pressure to keep their opposition silent" that chaplains against change would endure, but what about the less-than-subtle pressure long endured by those chaplains who oppose the DADT policy?

If chaplains can operate effectively in a war zone, surely they can withstand some subtle pressure to accept all soldiers as the children of God they were created to be.

The Rt. Rev. V. Gene Robinson; Concord, N.H.

The writer is the IX Bishop of New Hampshireand the first openly gay priest elected bishop in the worldwide Anglican Communion.

By Jeremy Wilson-Simerman, Legislative Manager |


Comments for this entry are closed.

Shannon Short in Dallas, TX on August 05, 2010 at 08.17 pm

How do fundamental Christian chaplains deal with Muslims, Hindus, Wiccans, and other faiths, that according to their beleif system, is going to hell for not accepting Jesus as God’s son?  Are they forced to not beleive that as well because of the other faiths?  How would allowing open service for gays and lesbians be any different or cause them to have to change their beleifs compared to my earlier example?  LOGIC…c’mon folks.  They already preach beside people they beleive are wrong, evil, and going to hell.