On the Road to San Diego
The dogwoods and azaleas were in full, glorious flower in Washington yesterday afternoon -- one of those exhilarating spring days which too quickly fade into the heat of summer here -- and David Hall and I were heading to Dulles Airport for our flight to San Diego, the first stop on a nine-day tour of six Western cities.
Yes, we’re taking SLDN on the road again, telling the story that’s familiar to most of you but that most Americans aren’t really aware of. In radio, television and newspaper interviews, and in community forums we’re spreading the word about how the sad chapter in American history entitled “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” came to be written.
It all started just over 15 years ago, when President Clinton said it was only fair that gays and lesbians should be able to serve openly in the military along with everybody else. He would issue an executive order to make that happen.
As we all know, it didn’t happen. The president’s announcement caused quite a stir, especially on Capitol Hill. Secret meetings were held in the corridors of power. Action would have to be taken. Congressional hearings were hastily arranged. Key players in the Pentagon testified openly and said “no way.” Key Congressmen and Senators were saying the same thing.
Right away it was clear where the votes were, and they weren’t with us. All that was left for Congress to do was to dress this ugly “no way” in something more presentable. How did they make this discriminatory and un-American policy look like something other than what it was? Here’s how. We’ll let gays and lesbians serve in the military. That’s fine, that’s fair. In America we respect the civil rights of everybody. We don’t discriminate. But there was one small proviso: if you’re gay or lesbian, you must keep quiet about it. No problem. Stay in the closet. Come out of the closet and you’re out of the service. We’ll make it the law of the land.
Eager to move on to other things, the president gave up the fight. He hurried to point out that the proposed new law was much better than the status quo.
Compromise was the word. A majority of Senators and House members liked the sound of that. Compromise is the American way. They congratulated themselves and moved on. Fortunately, some saw this law for the shameful thing it was. Unfortunately they did not prevail and the policy known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” became the law of the land.
It was unfair, totally against the nobler aspirations of this country. (You remember: “All men are created equal.”) It was wrong and foolish and unfair. It did not serve the best interests of the nation and of our military then; it does not serve their best interests now.
Between then and now thousands have been kicked out of the military, and thousands more said they’d had enough and left of their own accord. Careers were ruined and our national security was weakened.
The absurdity of this law became painfully obvious again this week when the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released Defense Department data showing that the armed services, in order to meet their recruiting goals are issuing an increasing number of “moral waivers” to felons convicted of serious offenses and others who would otherwise be ineligible.
What’s the message here? That most service members would rather share a foxhole with a violent convicted felon than with a gay man or woman? That seriously dangerous lawbreakers are more desirable than gays and lesbians?
That’s why we’re on the road: to spread the word among the American people and to raise money to get this offensive law repealed.
We’ll provide you with an update from San Diego later in the week.
-Aubrey SarvisLabels: On The Road
04-25-08






5 Comments
Comments for this entry are closed.Anonymous on December 31, 1969 at 02.00 pm
It is 6:45pm on the West Coast. I must say I really enjoy reading your blogs and got to admit I have never participated in one. When I saw this posting, I had to voice my concern. I donate a lot of money to SLDN and know two of your board members quite well. I got to say, I agree with one of the posts. Is this where my donations are going? We do not want to hear about Mr. Sarvis and Mr. Hall’s travels throughout the US. Why don’t you talk about what really matters like legislation and what you are doing to “Lift the Ban”? I would love to know how many times you and Mr. Hall have been knocking on the doors of our congress and senate buildings? I understand that you (Aubrey) are a former VP of Verizon and joined SLDN recently. Why don’t you post a blog about how much you personally know about Don’t Ask Don’t Tell?<BR><BR>A concerned Veteran Living in West Hollywood
——-
Anonymous on December 31, 1969 at 02.00 pm
Are you kidding me?!? I can read one of the dozens of books on the subject matter for the history lesson!! <BR><BR>Having supported SLDN for many many years now, and having followed the organizational changes, the progress towards repeal, and the countless number of people who received assistance from SLDN, I don’t want to sign onto this blog and read “Where’s Aubrey?”<BR><BR>I want to know SLDN’s strategy to get the subject into mainstream press, to see and read the stories of those affected by DADT, and feel and believe as if my support of SLDN contributes to those affected by DADT - not supporting the wayward travels of Mr. Sarvis as he pens his legacy.
Anonymous on December 31, 1969 at 02.00 pm
I am an active supporter of SLDN and former Marine and I feel that the new leadership is taking things in the wrong direction. Mr. Sarvis, you should really back things up a bit and re think your strategy. I feel you are taking SLDN down the wrong path.
Anonymous on December 31, 1969 at 02.00 pm
I’m a bit confused, and maybe someone call help me? This seems to be an excerpt from a book of some sort. A political book, that really has no impact to the day to day struggles of those facing the ramifications of DADT. <BR><BR>As a former sailor, serving both in the United States Ceremonial Guard and as a Chinese linguist, that just happened to be a lesbian, I am going to agree with the comment above. <BR><BR>One thing I enjoy the most about SLDN, is the contribution from the men and women that have been there. The speeches from individuals such as Steven Benjamin, Jason Knight, and Bryan Frick are what makes SLDN affective. Sharing the true stories of others, to make current veterans feel they too have support. <BR><BR>This blog used to be something I constantly checked on, sort of apart of my daily routine, and now it just seems like yet another political blog with no big impact on a day to day basis. Where did things change?
Anonymous on December 31, 1969 at 02.00 pm
As a former Army Captain, who served two tours in Iraq, it is beyond me to see the blog -a reflection of the organization- slowly deteriorate into what it has become. <BR><BR>I love SLDN, and they work they do, and the support they had for me and my case, don’t get me wrong. But this is just terrible!<BR><BR>You say that you are ‘telling the story that’s familiar to most’, did I miss that? How do you expect to tell our stories, if we are not there to tell it? Where are the ‘real-life’ stories of armed forces members who’s careers are consistently being ruined? Or is this all about a man after a legacy?<BR><BR>I think this is a disgrace to the service of all of us who have served or are currently serving, and it no way paves the way for those to serve in the future.<BR><BR>Former Army Captain